{"id":1230,"date":"2023-05-09T00:14:30","date_gmt":"2023-05-09T04:14:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.azurewebsites.net\/?p=1230"},"modified":"2023-06-25T20:04:48","modified_gmt":"2023-06-26T00:04:48","slug":"ayudar-a-la-vida-silvestre-a-navegar-por-la-infraestructura-vial-y-ferroviaria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/2023\/05\/ayudar-a-la-vida-silvestre-a-navegar-por-la-infraestructura-vial-y-ferroviaria\/","title":{"rendered":"Helping wildlife navigate road and railway infrastructure."},"content":{"rendered":"[et_pb_section fb_built=\u00bb1″ theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb][et_pb_row _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb][et_pb_column _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb type=\u00bb4_4″ theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Ecological connectivity can guide countries to select which areas to protect and conserve, to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, as codified in the text of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.<\/em><\/p>\n

According to a UN report, large-scale transport infrastructure projects currently underway or planned in 137 countries cut through approximately 60,000 km of the world\u2019s protected areas or Key Biodiversity Areas.<\/em><\/p>\n

A successful mitigation example to maintain landscape connectivity in India in recent years includes the elevated stretch of National Highway-44 near Pench Tiger Reserve in central India, where infrastructure is sited to circumvent critical areas for wildlife.<\/em><\/p>\n

Reflected in key goals and targets, ecological connectivity will be decisive, as countries move to implement the freshly minted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which, among its key targets, calls for a minimum of 30% of the earth\u2019s lands, freshwater, and oceans to be protected or conserved in some form by the year 2030, amid rapid infrastructural changes.<\/p>\n

\u201cAs countries now move to implement this target, connectivity must be a litmus test \u2013 with the choice of which areas to protect and conserve, guided by whether they contribute to connectivity. Likewise, urban growth, infrastructure development and other human activities must be planned in ways that achieve social and economic needs while preserving connectivity,\u201d Amy Fraenkel, Executive Secretary of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), told Mongabay-India at the UN Biodiversity Conference or COP15.<\/p>\n

After multiple delays due to COVID-19, nearly 200 countries at COP15 in Montreal sealed a landmark deal to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), with four goals and 23 action-oriented targets, was adopted after two weeks of intense negotiations. It replaces the Aichi Biodiversity Targets set in 2010.<\/p>\n

The CMS defines ecological connectivity as the \u201cunimpeded movement of species and the flow of natural processes that sustain life on Earth.\u201d Infrastructure, which often erodes connectivity, impacts biodiversity through deforestation, human-wildlife conflicts, habitat fragmentation, and loss.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Nilgiri_tahr_on_road_IMG20170816082910-1200×800-1-768×512-1.jpeg\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbNilgiri_tahr_on_road_IMG20170816082910-1200×800-1-768×512″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb text_orientation=\u00bbcenter\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-25px||||false|false\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_tablet=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_phone=\u00bb|0px||0px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_last_edited=\u00bbon|phone\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ global_colors_info=\u00bb{}\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Nilgiri tahr herd along a road in the Anamalai hills in south India. Photo by T. R. Shankar Raman\/Wikimedia Commons.<\/span><\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

\u201cThe new Global Biodiversity Framework only makes a general reference to infrastructure in target 14 with a call to integrate biodiversity in all sectors. However, target 1, on spatial planning, is directly relevant to ensuring that infrastructure is planned in a manner that avoids or minimizes negative impacts on biodiversity, and target 12 on urban planning includes strong language on connectivity,\u201d adds Fraenkel.<\/p>\n

While ecological connectivity was codified in the framework in two targets, infrastructure wasn\u2019t at the core of negotiations although several side events spotlighted the issue, such as the launch of ALIGN project \u2013 Asia\u2019s Linear Infrastructure safeGuarding Nature \u2013 created in response to Asia\u2019s rapid expansion of linear infrastructure, especially roads, railways, and power lines.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Climate and biodiversity talks recognise connectivity<\/h2>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Connectivity conservation was also recognised at the 27th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) or the Egypt climate talks (COP27), just weeks ahead of the Montreal talks. The climate summit saw the launch of the Wildlife Connect initiative by WWF, the Center for Large Landscape Conservation and the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas\u2019 Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group, to secure ecological connectivity.<\/p>\n

Conservation scientist Amrita Neelakantan, who spoke virtually at the launch of Wildlife Connect at COP27, said codifying infrastructure into the GBF was \u201calways going to be hard\u201d because the GBF will always be seen as something that\u2019s coming from the biodiversity community. \u201cAnd so for many of us, that is still wildlife trade, that is still illegal poaching, and so many other things that are direct wildlife measurements; infrastructure becomes reaching out across the aisle, across siloed systems,\u201d Neelakantan told Mongabay-India.<\/p>\n

Neelakantan, coordinator for the Network for Conserving Central India, works on human-dominated landscapes in central India, home to over 20% of global tiger populations. In a recent study available in pre-print, Neelakantan and co-authors call for a landscape-level conservation planning in India through a \u201cjudicious mix of land-sharing and land-sparing approaches, and co-production of ecosystem services\u201d to achieve the global 30by30 target.<\/p>\n

They find that \u201conly a fraction\u201d (\u223c15%) of high-priority biodiversity and conservational potential areas are included in India\u2019s extant protected area network that covers 5% of the country\u2019s area. Consequently, a large percentage of India\u2019s wildlife live outside protected boundaries giving rise to situations spanning between coexistence and conflict.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/grid-pavagada_ANC6290-768×512-1.webp\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbgrid-pavagada_ANC6290-768×512″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Overlaying administrative (district) boundaries, the paper highlights 338 districts that play a key role in maintaining India\u2019s biodiversity and ecosystem services; of these, 169 are \u2018high priority\u2019 districts, where the management focus needs to be on the retention of habitats, ecosystem services and biodiversity through both, state-driven and participatory approaches.<\/p>\n

The next 169 are \u2018potential priority\u2019 districts, where the management focus, besides retention of important sites, should also aim for proactive rewilding and ecological restoration efforts. \u201cIn conjunction, we also refer to India\u2019s aspirational districts, identified by the government of India\u2019s NITI Aayog for economic development. Locations, where aspirational districts overlap with \u2018high priority\u2019 districts, will require deprioritizing mega-infrastructure projects while promoting sustainable models of nature protection besides demarcation of PAs,\u201d Neelakantan and co-authors state in the paper.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fact that connectivity has made it into the text is brilliant because what it means is we can start to make 30 by 30 a milestone versus a goal. Connectivity allows you to consider not just putting forward more paper parks (protected areas are declared but then neglected). It allows you to say okay, how are you going to actually manage this land, and that is where infrastructure will sit,\u201d she explained, referring to the study.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/giiv-768×542-1.webp\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbgiiv-768×542″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb text_orientation=\u00bbcenter\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-25px||||false|false\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_tablet=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_phone=\u00bb|0px||0px|false|false\u00bb custom_padding_last_edited=\u00bbon|phone\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ global_colors_info=\u00bb{}\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

A screengrab from the Global Infrastructure Impacts Viewer, a tool for visualising the first global database of planned road and railway infrastructure, and the risks and benefits it may pose to people and the natural world. UNEP-WCMC. (2022). Global Infrastructure Impact Viewer. [On-line], [January\/2023], Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC. Available at: https:\/\/www.giiviewer.org\/.<\/span><\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Environmental risks from infrastructure and economic benefits<\/h2>\n

According to a UN report, large-scale transport infrastructure projects currently underway or planned, in 137 countries cut through approximately 60,000 km of the world\u2019s protected areas or Key Biodiversity Areas. Launched at COP15, the report weighs potential environmental impacts against anticipated economic benefits for such linear infrastructure projects.<\/p>\n

Drawing from a database of 57 sources, the analysis finds that planned or ongoing road and railway projects impact the habitats of nearly 2,500 bird, amphibian and mammal species of conservation concern, with an especially high risk of accelerating the decline of species in the global tropics, especially in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and South America.<\/p>\n

The projects will trigger the release of 883 million tonnes of carbon from removed trees and vegetation. The loss of vegetation related to the works will also imperil the retention of 1.17 million tonnes of nitrogen \u2013 without the plants, that additional nitrogen could be toxic to downstream water supplies, the report warns. China, the COP15 President, has the most road and rail infrastructure planned, followed by Russia and Brazil. The assessment places South Asia in the low-risk-high benefit category with regards to low risk to nature from infrastructure.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor India, the impact of infrastructure on wildlife comes from severing connectivity between protected areas which is essential for genetic health of wildlife populations. The issue is generally not that new areas are being opened up for clearing as in countries with high deforestation, such as Indonesia. In terms of roads leading to new clearing, India is low risk compared with high deforestation countries, but in terms of risks to landscape connectivity, the risk is not low,\u201d environmental geographer Ruth DeFries at the University of Columbia told Mongabay-India. She is not associated with the UN report but is a co-author with Neelakantan on the landscape-level conservation paper.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Road_through_the_forest_nilgirs_JEG6416-1200×800-1-768×512-1.jpeg\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbRoad_through_the_forest_nilgirs_JEG6416-1200×800-1-768×512″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb text_orientation=\u00bbcenter\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-25px||||false|false\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ global_colors_info=\u00bb{}\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Road cutting through the scrub forest in Nilgiris. Photo by PJeganathan\/Wikimedia Commons.<\/span><\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Opportunity for avoidance in Asia to enhance connectivity<\/h2>\n

A successful mitigation example to maintain landscape connectivity in India in recent years includes the elevated stretch of National Highway-44 near Pench Tiger Reserve in central India. \u201cThe best strategy is that infrastructure is sited to circumvent critical areas for wildlife. If these considerations are taken into account in the early planning stages, then the risks can be reduced,\u201d DeFries adds.<\/p>\n

The opportunity in Asia is avoidance, road ecologist Rob Ament said, at a COP15 side event discussing Asia\u2019s Linear Infrastructure safeGuarding Nature (ALIGN) Project.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can avoid the most important biological locales because the location hasn\u2019t been set yet. And so there\u2019s a great opportunity again in the pre-planning and the early planning to really think about route selection. That\u2019s very unusual compared to some of the other continents.\u201d<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/Flyover_in_Kanha-Pench_corridor_AJT_Johnsingh._DSCN4059-1200×800-1-768×512-1.jpg\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbFlyover_in_Kanha-Pench_corridor_AJT_Johnsingh._DSCN4059-1200×800-1-768×512″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb text_orientation=\u00bbcenter\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-25px||||false|false\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ global_colors_info=\u00bb{}\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Flyover in Kanha-Pench corridor. Photo by A. J. T. Johnsingh, WWF-India and NCF\/Wikimedia Commons.<\/span><\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

\u201cIf you look at the rest of the world, particularly North America and Europe, they\u2019re just adding another lane to a current highway or another rail line next to a current one or another power line where they already have the power corridor,\u201d Ament said, discussing findings from LISA (Linear Infrastructure Safeguards in Asia), a 14-month predecessor project set in 28 Asian countries that mapped 81,000 kms of new planned projects, mainly multilateral development projects. LISA informed project ALIGN.\n\n\u201cWhat we found in Asia are all new footprints. Two-thirds of these new linear infrastructure projects have new footprints. These LI could impact 350 protected areas,\u201d Ament said. Project ALIGN will be implemented throughout Asia, by WWF in partnership with the Center for Large Landscape Conservation, with three focal countries: India, Mongolia, and Nepal.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Need for a shift in the linear infrastructure sector<\/h2>\n

\u201cThere needs to be a shift by the linear infrastructure (LI) sector, really to start taking, incorporating the needs of nature, more on a regular basis or standard approach; that hasn\u2019t been done yet,\u201d Ament notes.<\/p>\n

At the side event, Megh Nath Kafle, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Environment, Nepal, shared that about 20% of mega species loss in Nepal is due to (vehicular) collision. \u201cAnd right now in our country, we have started to discuss it with engineers and biodiversity conservationists\u2026 they have started to sit side by side,\u201d Kafle said at the event.<\/p>\n

Amrita Neelakantan, who\u2019s researching safeguards for nature in the Belt and Road Initiative, says there is a need for more coordination between ministries, translation of documents into the language of official work on either side (country-funder-contractor), especially on accessing and linking databases on PAs and conservation areas into funder-driven safeguards. \u201cSpatial planning would become real,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of developing countries rely on top-down safeguarding, whether it\u2019s from their government or from the funder of infrastructure, those are the mechanisms to safeguard biodiversity. Almost all developing countries also sign on to multiple agreements on the environment. So our systems view of this problem was that countries will need to have different ways of coordinating (on safeguarding nature) to meet multiple goals,\u201d elaborated Neelakantan about the unpublished research.<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=\u00bbhttps:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/leopard-cat-roadkill-768×514-1.jpeg\u00bb _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb title_text=\u00bbleopard-cat-roadkill-768×514″ hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb text_orientation=\u00bbcenter\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-25px||||false|false\u00bb custom_padding=\u00bb0px|100px|0px|100px|false|false\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ global_colors_info=\u00bb{}\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Roadkill of the leopard cat. Photo by Kalyan Varma\/Wikimedia Commons.<\/span><\/p>[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb4.21.0″ _module_preset=\u00bbdefault\u00bb theme_builder_area=\u00bbpost_content\u00bb hover_enabled=\u00bb0″ sticky_enabled=\u00bb0″]

Additionally, the perception of a successful politician also needs to change. \u201cWhat that means is politicians\u2019 one job is to get reelected \u2013 if you\u2019re in a developing country, if you can build a large six-lane flyover, you have shown visible progress as a politician. We need to change the metrics of what makes a successful politician because that\u2019s who\u2019s making these decisions (infrastructure).\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cEven if we\u2019re in a five-year cycle (with the politician\u2019s official term), could we look at linking progress on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to a politician\u2019s success? For example, putting SDG dashboards at the district level online so that when you vote for your MLA you can check if public health or other parameters did get better,\u201d Neelakantan elaborated.<\/p>\n

CMS\u2019s Amy Fraenkel observes that text in the GBF and related decisions adopted at COP15 reflect the importance for governments to work together on the actual implementation of the GBF, where action by a single government will not be sufficient.<\/p>\n

\u201cExisting global agreements, including the Convention on Migratory Species, will play a key role in delivering on various aspects of the GBF, including on this aspect of ensuring collaboration across national borders. The 2019 IPBES Global Assessment found that governments had not adequately addressed connectivity under the framework of the Aichi Targets. But the Aichi Targets omitted another key point which is transboundary and international cooperation for implementing the framework,\u201d Fraenkel said.<\/p>\n

Source: India Mongabay<\/p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2022 La conectividad ecol\u00f3gica puede guiar a los pa\u00edses a seleccionar qu\u00e9 \u00e1reas proteger y conservar, para detener y revertir la p\u00e9rdida de la naturaleza para 2030, como se codifica en el texto del Marco de Biodiversidad Global de Kunming-Montreal. \u2022 Seg\u00fan un informe de la ONU, los proyectos de infraestructura de transporte a gran […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1232,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"wf_post_folders":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1230"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1230"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1230\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1491,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1230\/revisions\/1491"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1230"},{"taxonomy":"wf_post_folders","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildlifeconnect.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/wf_post_folders?post=1230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}